|
I would
love to get your take (a patient's point of view) on a GREAT
DEBATE I and some colleagues have been having. One camp feels
to charge anything less than $135 for an initial exam/x-ray
demeans and decreases the value of what we offer. By charging
more than offices around us we set ourselves as more valuable.
The other side feels that to gain value one must first produce
results and therefore allows for special offers ($25 x-rays)
to get people in the door. Much of the population does not
value chiropractic until they experience it. Any opinions?
My response:
If one's
self-esteem is so wrapped up in what one charges, why stop
at $135? How about $500? Or more?
Tragically,
due to the influence of third party reimbursement (which is
a short-term and quickly depreciating reality in the 108 year
history of the profession), chiropractic is starting to assume
some of the negative characteristics of medicine. Making the
entry fee high is among them.
Somehow,
chiropractic greats like Clay Thompson, Clarence Gonstead
and countless others saw no reason to charge high entry fees.
In fact, those practicing before the Faustian "validation"
offered by inclusion in third party schemes looked at fees
quite differently than most DCs today. So many chiropractors
have a "show me the money" attitude about practice
rather than the serving-others-protecting-principle notion
that prompted hundreds to go to jail for chiropractic. Know
any colleagues who would go to jail to protect chiropractic
these days?
If you
want to salute the values of third parties (symptom treating,
short-term, no kids, etc.) charging as much as you can get
away with seems to make sense. Yet on the other hand, if you
want cash-paying wellness families, one might think twice
about making the entry fee high. What kind of practice do
you want? Just what do you think chiropractic is? A natural
therapy for back pain? Or a way of life?
So the
answer depends upon what vision you have of the future of
the profession and how you see chiropractic fitting into (or
remaining outside) the medical industrial complex that runs
"health" care in our nation.
If I were
in practice I'd do everything I could to stay outside the
reimbursement model, charging a fee-for-service that families
could afford.
If all
third party reimbursement vanished tonight, incomes would
immediately plummet. Those who are intellectually honest and
admit to this marketplace reality use it as proof that reimbursement
is a good and necessary thing. Yet, I think it has stolen
the very soul of chiropractic.
On our
deathbeds, we won't care how much money we made or give much
thought to our biggest collection day. No, we'll recount the
lives we touched, the relationships we formed and the eternal
differences we made. Something difficult to do when you're
just the "boy" for an HMO.\
Bill
|